Ethics and regulatory coordination
Prepare the right documents for the right review.
Coordinate the research submission pathway while keeping ethics decisions, product permissions and institutional responsibilities distinct.
Planned · availability unverifiedDiscuss your studyIdentify the applicable review route
Assess the protocol, product, phase, risk, funding and study institutions. Confirm whether review belongs with a recognized IRC or the national NHRC ERB and whether DDA authorization is required. International or multicentre arrangements may add documentation and joint-review requirements.
Scope submission coordination
Coordination and submission support only—not approval services.
- Current-checklist review and document-gap tracking
- Protocol and participant-material version control
- Investigator and institution documentation coordination
- NHRC submission and DDA-related documentation where applicable
- Response, correspondence and approval-condition tracking
- Amendment, renewal and final-report coordination
Distinguish approval from imports and registration
An ethics decision is not an investigational-product import licence, and a registry entry is not a trial permit. Establish the required sequence with NHRC and DDA. Avoid assuming that a single submission completes every institutional, product or transport obligation. Include NCTR and the appropriate internationally accepted registry in planning. Resources provides the NHRC portal links and WHO recognition lists.
Keep the approval conditions visible
Create a calendar for expiry dates, continuing reports, safety notices and changes requiring review. Use the requirements attached to the actual study decisions and confirm current authority instructions. Timelines and approval outcomes are determined by the responsible authorities.
Common questions
Clarify the scope.
How is the scope agreed?
Begin with the protocol and required deliverables, then confirm the team, responsibilities, dependencies and acceptance criteria in writing. Service availability must be confirmed before commitment.
Can approval, recruitment or delivery dates be guaranteed?
No. Authority decisions, site capacity and study circumstances determine the schedule. Planning should identify assumptions and dependencies rather than promise an outcome.
Sources and further reading
Additional Resource
- NHRC — National Ethical Guidelines for Health Research in Nepal (2022)
- Department of Drug Administration — Regulatory role
- WHO — Primary registries in the clinical trials registry network
- ICH — E6(R3) Good Clinical Practice, Principles and Annex 1 (2025)
- NHRC — Nepal Clinical Trials Registry project and IRERP migration notice
- WHO — Other registries, including Nepal
Related pages
A study-specific conversation
Let’s clarify what your study needs.
Start with a clear brief. Shape the right support around your study.


